New Newer pol psotion

 Q) What does ''seventeenth post political position' mean? 

1) A Peronism (Fourth-Transversal way) on a political issue and similar to Danish National Libertarianism  (not too different from an indifference position) 

2) Basically a seventeenth post political position is like an 'other side political post position' on a political issue which is . Seventeenth post politcial position is also known as Anti Ideology

3) An Omniliberal-Third Way Social Authoritarian FoFourth Positionist

4) I have either (1) A Max Stirner-esque critique of dogma and ideological thinking as a distinct phenomenon in favor of "critical self-theory" at individual and communal levels. Or (2) A Bouvier-esque critique of there being no inherent meaning to life, yet that we're forced to grapple with the physical and environmental drives we were raised with, to figure out how we want to engage with our fellow man/woman from there. Or (3) Some entirely different foundation.

: Some universes/dimensions have Flirp Flarpist  or are Hyperlane (like here, here), meaning political positions that are not left, right, middle, radical centrist, apolitical, neutral but as opposite of like left and right as left and right are opposite of each other

So with Flirp Flarpist  or Hyperlane (like here, here, here or similar like here) universes/dimensions where saying 'I am fifth political position on same sex adoption'' or 'I am sixth political position on the death penalty' would mean you have a political position that is as opposite of for and against as for and against are opposition of each other but you can't imagine such a position in our universe /dimension but only in Flirp Flarpist or Hyperlane ones.

So the above belong to new horizontal directional positions besides left and right that are found in other universes/dimensions but they still are political positional.  

This is similar to saying you are either left, right middle, radical centrist, apolitical, neutral on a political view (meaning you still have a political position on it just one that exists in a universe/dimension with more directions and positions than our dimension and thus we can't fathom said directions or positions).  It would still follow the 'OR'  (are you left or centrist, or right or sixth political position or fourth political position on wind farming?)

HOWEVER , in some universes/dimensions there are no directional positions at all but they have their own laws of nature thus by extension the whole concept of political position would not exist and something else would exist in place of directional positions and by extension post political positions in such a universe/dimension (so us trying to imagine said alternatives to political positions in those universes with different laws of nature would be like people in those other universes with those alternatives to political positions where it is impossible to have a left/right/ or any political position trying to imagine what a political position (such as in our universe) is like

This is the jist of a Seventh Post Political position on an issue/topic

It would be indirect position on a political issue or would go beyond having a position on a political issue. Whatever the closest adjacent equivalent of positional/directions are in said universe/dimension . It would go beyond the 'OR' (see here for what I am getting at)

Seventeenth Post Political position is pretty much Dark Deleuze-ism (also see here)/ Deleuzoguattarianism 

Seventeenth Post Political position is Ideology Disintegrationism

It basically is a Multiverse political position/Brane Cosmology:

"Some universes can even have different laws of physics and totally different particles."

•  Platonism - What if World of Ideas is just a parallel universe? (Multiverse theory to Platonism)
•  Brane Cosmology - Our theory but mixed with string theory. (Multiverse theory to BC)

A Seventeenth post political position is a post political stance/position on issues and it is as opposite of having a political position on a topic as left and right political stances/positions on issues are opposite of each other (but this is as opposite of apoliticalism/neutral/indifference as apoliticalism/neutral/indifference is to having a left or right political stance/position on issues

"In the ninth dimension, we can compare all the possible universe histories, starting with all the different possible laws of physics and initial conditions. In the tenth and final dimension, we arrive at the point in which everything possible and imaginable is covered. Beyond this, nothing can be imagined by us lowly mortals, which makes it the natural limitation of what we can conceive in terms of dimensions."

Political positions in a  'other side of the dimensions' universes/dimensions would not exist but there would be stuff like maybe Situationist or  Conceptionalist (similar to Kantian) or something like this

Quantum State Anti-Realism[edit | edit source]

Quantum State Anti-Realism challenges the direct correspondence between physical properties and quantum states. Anti-realists about quantum states may argue that quantum states do not have an ontic reality and are instead interpreted as mere mathematical tools or subjective representations of our knowledge or information about the system. They may reject the notion that distinct preparations can lead to the same ontic state or that ontic states can be compatible with different quantum states.

fdfdfdf  OffCompass and from a post political position from a different political spectrum(s) from other political compases

Any attempt to comprehend this ideology, even at its simplest term is so oxymoronic that it can't be even placed at the political spectrum. (like Ideological Theocracy)  /a fuzzy logic position

Maybe similar to this type of political positionism, cutting the Gordian Knot ,  breaking the Strange Loop and solving Paradoxes (including causality dilemmas like solving the Chicken or the Egg paradox, similar to a bootstrapping solution or Egg of Columbus positional

It has elements similar to Garden of Eden, Affirming a disjunct , or Multistable perceptive (Photographs of craters, from either the moon or other planets including our own, can exhibit this phenomenon. Craters in stereo vision, such as our eyes, normally appear concave. However, in monocular presentations, such as photographs, the elimination of our depth perception causes multistable perception, which can cause the craters to look like plateaus rather than pits. 

For humans, the "default" interpretation comes from an assumption of top-left lighting, so that rotating the image by 180 degrees can cause the perception to suddenly switch.[6][7] This phenomenon is called the concave/convex, or simply up/down, ambiguity, and it confuses computer vision as well.[8])

"Multistable Figures · ICI Berlin Press

ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry

https://press.ici-berlin.org › catalogue › doi

Multistable figures offer an intriguing model for arbitrating conflicting positions. ... Identity Politics Redux / K. Heintzman."

or Transcendental idealism or the solution to the free will problem, or Dialetheism or Anti Paradox Tolerance or Multiple negation or this or this , or this or this. Maybe Modal subordination (like here)

If the Emperor knew that the Warmaster would betray him ...

Reddit

https://www.reddit.com › comments › if_the_emperor_k...

Jan 3, 2023 — He had a plan so complex that human minds can't comprehend it,

How to Decontaminate Democracy - Lack of Lesser

lackoflesser.com

https://lackoflesser.com › ...

Sep 30, 2016 — In some way our human minds can't comprehend, it weeds out the uninformed and uneducated without favoring any race, gender, age, religion, ...

"jmwp04

University of Pittsburgh

http://aei.pitt.edu › jmwp04

by F Attina · 1996 — This would bring the casting out of the world political organization from the bi-dimensional box. Still, in the short/medium term, the evolution of the ..."

Similar to (or essentially the same as) voting present and similar to ek/out as mentioned here

The Early Nietzsche's Post-Political Rhetoric

Like: Georgia State University https://archive.ph/GHe8X

https://scholarworks.gsu.edu › cgi › viewcontent

by K Nichols · 2016 — “Schopenhauer as Educator” commits Nietzsche to a post-political position. INDEX WORDS: Nietzsche, Political theory, Culture, Aristocracy, ...

Following the discussion of the criteria that might lead one to consider a new field a matter field or a modification of spacetime and gravity (or a new gravitational and/or spatiotemporal degree of freedom), we shall—after introducing SFDM in more detail (section 4)—apply these criteria to the case of SFDM (section 5). We shall argue that the often unquestioned assumption that every field is either a matter field or a gravitational/spacetime field is put under severe pressure by SFDM. In particular, we will argue that the newly introduced scalar field in SFDM is both a matter field and a gravitational/spacetime field. This result will then be the starting point of the second companion paper (Martens & Lehmkuhl, forthcoming), where we will unpack the interpretational questions raised above, both in the context of SFDM as well as in the broader context of charting (the neighbourhood of SFDM in) the space of theories.

OR like : Can We Share a World Beyond Representation? https://www.e-flux.com/journal/106/314167/can-we-share-a-world-beyond-representation/

e-flux

https://www.e-flux.com › journal › can-we-share-a-wo...

... of others” has created a form of “reified subjectivity” that enables a spectacularized, uncommitted, and “post-political” position vis-à-vis the world.

OR (from here)

"A: As said above, "transcending space and time" is a very vague statement by itself and can mean multiple things depending on the context in which it is made, as well as how this characteristic is portrayed in the first place. However, if it is specified that they "transcend space and time" in the sense that they exist on some higher level of reality that is qualitatively superior to a spacetime continuum in nature, then they should be put at Low 1-C, assuming the continuum in question is one comprised of four dimensions. 

The answer may vary depending on this factor.

It is perfectly possible for a statement like transcending space and time to mean that a character is simply "untied" from the universe's spacetime, and is thus unaffected by alterations in the timeline and similar meddlings. It's not exactly uncommon for time travel (Or any action / process that affects something through different points in time) to be described as "transcending time and space." 

Transcend space and time can also refer to a spacetime continuum being different to a "regular" spacetime continuum (Say, a strange-looking reality that may hold a few different physical laws, for example) or slightly do be more complex than a regular universe, even significantly so, but not qualitatively superior. Something A being said to "transcend" something B in real life can refer to the former being superior to the latter in some qualities in a notable way, but still roughly compatible. 

It does not necessarily mean transcendence not in an immeasurable way that would be graphically indescribable, such as A's qualities being superior to B by infinite amounts. With this in mind, statements of realities or beings with transcendence over space & time/the universe/etc., on their own, are not assumed to refer to qualitatively superiority, unless of course further context may elaborate on and contextualize this.

It should also be noted that simply existing in some alternate state of existence that lacks time and/or space is not really grounds for any tier in particular, as lacking such things does not translate to being superior to them, and would most often overlap with abilities like Acausality or Nonexistent Physiology. A good example of a case like this is Dormammu (Marvel Cinematic Universe), who is stated to exist in a realm "far beyond time," yet never actually displays any superiority over it, and is in fact vulnerable to time-based abilities due to his timeless nature."

An other side political position also includes post positions such as Opaque contexts, having a Top/Bottom political position instead of a left liberal 2.0 right one , adhering the viewpoint 'Not left , not liberal 2.0, not right but Forward' and something similar to the Progressive utilization theory induced New version of the Hyperlane  (here, here) position including an out of this world like political position (basically like a Supervaluationism type of position) 

An other side political post position also incorporates stuff from the Fourth Political theory (4pt) to give a post political position on issues (including an Epistemic Democracy) fused with a political position stance/view from a Flirp Flarpist type of universes/dimensions (maybe in the vein of redditor yeslikethedrink's Flarpist-Blarpism). So basically a Fourth Political theory version of Flirp Flarpist/Hyperlanist (maybe an ideology that Stupidpol would call Flarpist Blarpist)

Like maybe a "Beyond/transcend the left, liberal 2.0 and right but against the center" view

"Constructing the 4PT we arrive to the rediscovery of the Pre-Modernity understood not as the past, but as the a-temporal structure of principles and values belonging to the different philosophical Universe (where exist Eternity, God or gods, angels, souls, devil, end of time and resurrection of dead). The concept of past (as as something that is not any more) with pejorative connotation is essentially Modern concept based in its turn on the negation of the dimension of Eternity and absolutization of the time (becoming). The Pre-Modernity is not the past. The Pre-Modernity is society, culture, Weltanschauung and political system constructed on the fundamental belief in the Eternity. The Modernity denies that - hence its chrono-centric epistemology.

In the context of Modernity we are dealing with Cartesian subject. Its actual normative interpretation is liberal one -- individual. So we need to deconstruct this concept of individual making appeal to the pre-modern understanding of human being and its essence." 

This is like with Afro Pessimism where this political post position tries to negate the negation

Like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_S%C3%B8ren_Kierkegaard:

In Kierkegaard's meaning, purely theological assertions are subjective truths and they cannot be either verified or invalidated by science, i.e. through objective knowledge.[18] For him, choosing if one is for or against a certain subjective truth is a purely arbitrary choice.[18] 

He calls the jump from objective knowledge to religious faith a leap of faith, since it means subjectively accepting statements which cannot be rationally justified.[18] For him the Christian faith is the result of the trajectory initiated by such choices, which don't have and cannot have a rational ground (meaning that reason is neither for or against making such choices).[18] Objectively regarded, purely theological assertions are neither true nor false.[18]

exempleary perople

calm, committed to parents, seek understanding, seek harmony, not anxious, takes high road, makes demands of self, accomplish what they say, cherish excellence, cherish fairness, neither for or against anything, slow to speak & quick to act, respectful, do not let mind stray, seek balance (source;Quizlet)

Chapter 3 BEYOND FOR AND AGAINST: TENDENCIES OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM(pp. 53-92)

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqmp29t.7

https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvqmp29t.7

As part of the ongoing ‘transvaluation’ of established literary values, we have successfully argued and accepted that texts, authors, genres and social groups other than the canonical ones ought to be studied as part of the syllabi. 

In other words, we are past the phase of ‘restricted entry’, and objects of study have democratically multiplied. But there has been no corresponding rethinking, at least to the same degree, on what more can be done with the old and the new entrants. Somehow, originality in research has come to mean writing theses and books on less-canonical works. When we decide merely...

Like this (from https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/identities-and-freedom-feminist-theory-between-power-and-connection/): twithstanding, there are ways that "home" also denotes a domain of experience that is necessary for all human flourishing. Feminists, she accordingly urged, should not reject the value of home, but rather should demand that its benefits -- a space of personal meaning, security, and needed privacy -- be available for all and not only for the privileged few. 

Weir rehearses the early critiques of the dangers of "home" with some sympathy. She then discusses Young's response to them and argues that we should move beyond for-and-against arguments in order to view "home" as a locus of values that transcend such dichotomies. 

"Home," Weir argues, may be a site for connections in which we both accept the risks of conflict and where we may, in freedom, expand the self in "loving" relationships: "freedom is precisely the capacity to be in relationships that one desires: to love whom and what you choose to love" (57; 

Weir's emphasis). She argues that in creating such new political "homes" for ourselves within movements of "feminist solidarity" we also engage in creating new forms of "transformative identification with ideals, with each other, and with a feminist 'we'" (61).

Q) What is the connection between a Seveneenth Post Political position and a Fourth Political Position

A from Four's article on Wikipedia:  

• The sum of the first four prime numbers two + three + five + seven is the only sum of four consecutive prime numbers that yields an odd prime number, seventeen, which is the fourth super-prime. Four lies between the first proper pair of twin primes, three and five, which are the first two Fermat primes, like seventeen, which is the third. On the other hand, the square of four (${\displaystyle 4^2}$), equivalently the fourth power of two (${\displaystyle 2^4}$), is sixteen; the only number that has ${\displaystyle {�}^{�}={�}^{�}}$ as a form of factorization.